Accuracy, context, and reader safety.
Our publishing standard is designed for careful health education, not diagnosis, prescriptive care, or sensational claims.
1. Scope and intent
Content is created for general education. Articles should define their scope, avoid individualized recommendations, and point readers toward qualified care when personal interpretation is required.
2. Evidence and sourcing
Future clinical and nutrition claims will be supported by sources appropriate to the claim, favoring recognized public-health guidance, professional clinical guidance, systematic reviews, and peer-reviewed primary research. Evidence quality, relevance, and date matter; a citation alone does not make a claim reliable.
3. Review and updates
Published articles will identify publication or update dates. Material involving diagnosis, laboratory interpretation, treatment, or supplementation should receive subject-appropriate review before publication. Content will be revisited when guidance changes or a substantive correction is needed.
4. Language and uncertainty
We avoid guarantees, fear-based framing, and “miracle” language. Association is not described as causation. Where evidence is limited or contested, that uncertainty should be visible to the reader.
5. Commercial independence
Any future sponsorship, affiliate relationship, or other material commercial connection will be disclosed where it may affect a reader's interpretation. Commercial considerations must not determine health conclusions.
6. Corrections
Meaningful factual errors will be corrected promptly and transparently. Minor typographical fixes may be made without a formal correction note when they do not alter meaning.